It is not unusual for couples to both be patients at the
clinic. Typically, if one is uninsured, they both are. So, Liz and Jack are a
fairly typical couple. They both have chronic healthcare issues. They are both
employed – he works a job that tends to be seasonal, so makes decent money when
he works, but cannot count on work all year. She works as a housekeeper at an
extended care facility. They give her 37 hours of work per week, and that way they
don’t have to provide her with benefits: namely, healthcare insurance. It is
how many companies keep their costs lowered.
They both are compliant patients – they get their
medications regularly, see the doctor when needed and follow our directions, as
best they can.
She needs insulin – a very costly medication. The clinic
cannot afford to purchase insulin, so we access it for our patients through the
Prescription Assistance Programs offered by pharmaceutical companies. These
medications are provided at no charge to the clinic or the patient; the patient
has to qualify – usually based on income and insurance status. Liz and Jack
make too much for her to qualify for the insulin. They don’t make enough to
purchase affordable healthcare coverage; they cannot afford her insulin.
So, what do you do? Liz’s health will decline rapidly
without the insulin. When her health declines, she will no longer be able to
work; she will eventually have to go on dialysis or have a kidney transplant.
How does any of this make sense? If we could get the insulin
she needs, we could prevent the complications of her diabetes from becoming
this severe. We could ensure that she would be able to continue working, continue
contributing to society, but instead… she could very well end up on disability.
How does this make sense?
Thank you for explaining these difficult issues in a clear way. The best audience would be our congressmen/women. They need to understand this at a basic level. Liz Webb
ReplyDelete